IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 28 September 2010 Members (asterisk for those attending): Adge Hawes, IBM * Ambrish Varma, Cadence Design Systems Anders Ekholm, Ericsson * Arpad Muranyi, Mentor Graphics Corp. Barry Katz, SiSoft * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brad Brim, Sigrity Brad Griffin, Cadence Design Systems Chris Herrick, Ansoft Chris McGrath, Synopsys Danil Kirsanov, Ansoft David Banas, Xilinx Deepak Ramaswany, Ansoft Donald Telian, consultant Doug White, Cisco Systems Eckhard Lenski, Nokia-Siemens Networks Eckhard Miersch, Sigrity Essaid Bensoudane, ST Microelectronics * Fangyi Rao, Agilent Ganesh Narayanaswamy, ST Micro Gang Kang, Sigrity Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems Ian Dodd, consultant Jerry Chuang, Xilinx Joe Abler, IBM * John Angulo, Mentor Graphics John Shields, Mentor Graphics * Ken Willis, Sigrity Kellee Crisafulli, Celsionix Kumar Keshavan, Sigrity Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems Luis Boluna, Cisco Systems * Michael Mirmak, Intel Corp. Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Steinberger, SiSoft Mustansir Fanaswalla, Xilinx Patrick O'Halloran, Tiburon Design Automation Paul Fernando, NCSU Pavani Jella, TI Radek Biernacki, Agilent (EESof) * Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Ray Komow, Cadence Design Systems Richard Mellitz, Intel Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Samuel Mertens, Ansoft Sam Chitwood, Sigrity Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Scott McMorrow, Teraspeed Consulting Group Shangli Wu, Cadence Design Systems Sid Singh, Extreme Networks Stephen Scearce, Cisco Systems Steve Kaufer, Mentor Graphics Steve Pytel, Ansoft Syed Huq, Cisco Systems Syed Sadeghi, ST Micro Ted Mido, Synopsys Terry Jernberg, Cadence Design Systems * Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov, Mentor Graphics Vikas Gupta, Xilinx Vuk Borich, Agilent * Walter Katz, SiSoft Wenyi Jin, LSI Logic Zhen Mu, Mentor Graphics ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Opens: Bob raised a question about the Taps parameter: - It must be an integer, right? - Walter: Correct Bob raised a question about parameter branch levels: - Can reserved parameters have lower branch parameters? - Assume it would not be allowed - Walter: Currently none have lower levels - In the future there may be nested reserved parameters - We should not rule that out now - Bob: Could lower branches be attached to existing parameters? - Walter: No it would have to be a new parameter -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: - none ------------- Review of ARs: - Arpad: Continue discussion of Flow BIRD by email - Done - Arpad: Write parameter passing syntax proposal (BIRD draft) for -AMS models in IBIS that is consistent with the parameter passing syntax of the AMI models - TBD: Propose a parameter passing syntax for the SPICE - [External ...] also? - TBD - Arpad: Review the documentation (annotation) in the macro libraries. - Deferred until a demand arises or we have nothing else to do ------------- New Discussion: Arpad discussed changes made for deprecation of Use_Init_Output: - We need to remove every reference to Use_Init_Output - Bob: I can accept this as-is - Would like to know if model makers use it - Arpad: Everyone should be using it because it is in the spec - Walter: We use it but will stop in the next release - Bob: If we have version data we might warn that it is being ignored - Everyone needs to know about this change - Ambrish: We use Use_Init_Output but will also stop in the next release - Bob: A note should be in the BIRD saying it undoes BIRD 107 - Ambrish: BIRD 107 added more than that - Arpad: BIRD 107 appeared before 5.0 - Todd: Bob suggests a historical reference, not technical - Mike: It backs out a feature of BIRD 107, not the whole BIRD - No comment about BIRD 107 will be added Todd showed the latest Flow BIRD (2010 09 27): - Fangyi: In Step 6b the outputs of steps 3 and 5 both include the channel - Arpad: Step 3 talks about avoiding double counting - One method is to not use Tx GetWave - Fangyi: The input to Rx is channel + Tx EQ? - Arpad: So going to Step 5a is the problem - Ambrish: But in that case we would go to Step 5b - Arpad: The wording is not clear - Fangyi: This problem did not exist in a previous version - Walter: This should be worked out outside of this meeting - Bob: The editorial work should be done too Walter showed the Labels BIRD: - This will make Lists more useful - Arpad: We could have the same rules for Lists and Tables - It should be more consistent - Walter: There is confusion about where to use double quotes - Vendors have had trouble with this - Bob: Labels would be used differently within Lists and Tables - Also Labels becomes a new reserved word - Walter: We could use a different word - Arpad: It would be better to have a common syntax - Can Labels be scoped within Lists? - Walter: That violates our syntax rules - Bob: Lists could be like Table but with no parens around the data. - Mike: That is messy - Walter: We should find out how people are using Tables - Ambrish: We use Tables as DLL inputs - Ken: We use that too - Walter: Can we get some examples? - If Table is used as an input it needs more documentation - For example are strings allowed? Do they require quotes? - Walter: A number of IC vendors want this BIRD - Labels could be List_Labels - Bob: It is a burden on IBIS to document two very similar features - It becomes elevated to the same status as a reserved word Walter: Where should I discuss a new idea about corners in IBIS? - Arpad: Open forum would be best Next meeting: 05 October 2010 12:00pm PT -------- IBIS Interconnect SPICE Wish List: 1) Simulator directives